Friday, April 28, 2006

Nazi Convert to Militant Islam

I spent several decades of my life fighting for what I regarded as my people, my race and my nation, and endured two terms of imprisonment arising out of my political activities.’ But his belief is now that: ‘The pure authentic Islam of the revival, which recognises practical jihad (holy war) as a duty, is the only force that is capable of fighting and destroying the dishonour, the arrogance, the materialism of the West . . .
For the West, nothing is sacred, except perhaps Zionists, Zionism, the hoax of the so-called Holocaust, and the idols which the West and its lackeys worship, or pretend to worship, such as democracy. They want, and demand, that we abandon the purity of authentic Islam and either bow down before them and their idols, or accept the tame, secularised, so-called Islam which they and their apostate lackeys have created.
This may well be a long war, of decades or more — and we Muslims have to plan accordingly. We must affirm practical jihad — to take part in the fight to free our lands from the kuffar (unbelievers). Jihad is our duty.’
Abdul Aziz ibn Myatt, previously known as David Myatt, a founder of the British National Socialist Movement (BNSM) and jailed for racist attacks. Now supports the setting up of a Muslim superstate.

7 comments:

El Tom said...

Just goes to show how close the two ideologies can get. I suppose hes going to the land of the aryans?

where you find this diverse range of sources is beyond me, your blog is excellent. you deserve more exposure than you get. have you thought about adding yourself to the Euston Manifesto group of bloggers?

Hanif Leylabi said...

What is your point?

Islam is a Nazi ideology? Muslims are Nazis? Let's attack the Islamic Republic?

Sickening Islamophobia. Why don't you go and jump into bed with the AWL if you haven't already.

Azarmehr said...

Dear Hanif, I am so glad you put your comments here and I really hope the people that read my blog see what an arsehole you and the SWP are and how infantile your logic is.

Still I rather jump in bed with AWL than with the SWP or the Muslim fundamentalists. At least the AWL have the guts to condemn child abuse state laws in Iran. SWP won't in case that helps imperialism :))))

Your arguments are so laughable and yet so tragic. They remind me of the Fedayeen (Majority) organisation in Iran after the revolution and after the split in the Fedayeen.

They had read in Lenin's books that the petti-bourgeoise is a natural ally of the proletariat. Unfortuately Lenin had never seen or defined an Ayatollah. The Fedayeen then decided that the Iranian clergy was petti-bourgiose :))) and so the natural ally of the proletariat and therefore they must get behind them in the fight against imperialism. Then the Fedayeen (Majority) started doing favours for the clerics in Iran by betraying their former comrades in the Fedayeen (Minority), giving away their safe houses etc. Of course the clerics were delighted with this service but once their sell by date was finished, they slaughtered the Fedayeen(Majority) too. Some of the Fedayeen (Majority) manged to escape, and later joined the SWP :))

Dear Hanif, I have heard, seen and experienced all this nonsense, the SWP mutters on about. You have lost the plot. The first sign of knowing when someone has lost the plot is when in the poverty of their arguments, they try to attach unjustified accusations to the other side.

By the way you suffer from secularphobia and democracyphobia :)) I am just glad Marx is not alive to see the likes of you or he would have kicked himself back into his grave.

Kash said...

Hahahaha thats the best thing I had read in some time

Hanif Leylabi said...

The poverty of my arguments? I think it was you who started the personal insults in the form of obscene language.

Have some Chaee and calm down.

You comparison between the Fadaeen (Majority) and the SWP are fateous and show a clear lack of understanding of the SWP position.

We are not saying that the petty bourgeoisie are allies of the working classes. We are saying that the imperialist bourgeoisie are bigger enemies because they, have killed more people, have oppressed more people and would so so again in Iran if given half a chance.

You support the destruction and occupation of your own country by a force which has damaged Iran countless times in the past.

You should be ashamed.

Azarmehr said...

YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED! When did I support the occupation and destruction of my country for you to suggest this?? When did I ask for US troops to bomb Iran?
I asked YOU and your SWP kindergarden Socialists, when in the last 27 years have you had any campaigns against any of the crimes of the medieval theocratic regime of the clerics in Iran and you couldn't name any!!

Because if you and other "progressive" active groups HAD! then the Iranian opposition would be that much stronger, the Iranian workers would have a bit more international backing, the Iranian women would not feel so let down and the 100 year old struggle of the Iranian people for freedom of speech and an accountable government would be that much near fruition.

Instead YOU and YOUR kindergarten Socialists at the SWP, invent things that the likes of me have never said, because you have no other arguments.
You are a disgrace.

Azarmehr said...

Thanks Tom, I need to find out a bit more about Euston Manifesto. I had never heard of them before.