Sunday, February 14, 2010

Karroubi's Son Threatened with Rape Inside Amir-ol-Momenin Mosque

Karroubi's third son, Ali who was arrested by Law Enforcement Forces on 11th February, was taken to Amir-ol-momenin Mosque, which was used as a temporary detention centre for protesters. There, as the detainees were identified, the lackeys of the Supreme Leader realised they had Karroubi's son in their possession. After contacting their superiors they felt comfortable to deal with Ali as they pleased. As they beat Ali repeatedly in front of other detainees, they used the foulest language to insult his mother and father. Not only that but in what is supposed to be a house of God, inside the very mosque of Amir-ol-momenin, Ali Karroubi was threatened with rape. A hideous act so deplorable that it is punishable by death in Islam let alone if it is carried out inside a mosque. Yet they felt so proud of what they were doing that they were also filming the beating.

When the order to transfer Ali Karroubi to the Motahari barracks came, one of his torturers sighed and said, 'If only they gave me another 24 hours, I would have sent your corpse to your family'.

23 comments:

Arash said...

Evil. Pure evil.

Arash

Sohrab said...

Courageous sons -- the apples have not fallen far from the tree.

SZ said...

Once again potkin,

where are the sources for all the quotes you post, or where is the infamous video clip you claim they took.

Its all lies! you are simply a british lackey and liar.

The funny thing is that idiots like Arash and Sohrab believe you! hahahaha..wow! I needed that laugh before my flight to London.

Azarmehr said...

SZ,

How many times do I have to show you up?
Since you dont seem to be able to read and write Persian or have listened to any of teh interviews with Karroubi's wife, I send you an English tranlation of her letter
http://www.roozonline.com/english/news/newsitem/article/2010/february/15//fatemeh-karoubis-painful-letter.html

So there you egg on your face once again.

SZ said...

Potkin,

Are you fucking serious? This is hearsay!

jus because this mother says her son was threatened, this makes her a good reliable source? Are you kidding?

There are no firsthand sources whatsoever. For a guy who claims to be a secular liberal, you sure do have some bias in your reporting. You're a flat out liar.

there is no egg on my face you idiot, because your sources are all from dissident sites with shoddy reputations for reporting.

Azarmehr said...

SZ,

Karroubi's wife has written a letter to Khameneii describing teh treatment of his son Ali. Khameneii should now investigate these claims and you are therefore calling Karroubi's wife a liar. I happen to think Khamaneii and Ahmadinejad have a proven track record of being liars.

In any case can you tell me why Ali Karroubi was detained? Where is it a crime to defend your 73 year old father against thugs?

SZ said...

Potkin,

Yes, I am calling his wife a liar. the burden of proof is on her, and until there is significant evidence of any misconduct in prison involving any prisoner, she is considered a liar. The burden of proof is not on anyone else but her and her family.

First off, Karroubi should not have been in the protests. those protests were illegal and without merit. The protestors had no permits and therefore were subject to arrest. the police tried to detain Karroubi and when his son stepped in to defend his father, he interfered with an official police action. Therefore he is liable to be arrested.

I am not saying defending his father wasn't the right thing to do in his view. Defending his father in that instance was illegal because he nor his father had permits to protest.

Look, if they want to defy the laws of our country, they can do so, but do so at their own peril. You can't have it both ways.

Now that they have a complaint against the government, they want an official investigation. But at the same time, they ignore the laws against illegal protests and come out to protest anyway.

I defend his right to defend his father, I really do, but he broke the law when him and his father were out proteting without permits.

Arash said...

SZ Kore Khar

I didn't believe it because Potkin said it, I believe these atrocities occur because I know how to read. If you spent less time being a bache sefarati/wannabe Basiji, you might be able to do some reading too!

Arash

Anonymous said...

SZ is an evil lying AMERICAN! He is NOT living in Iran, supporting the vile regime he loves so much! Stay safe in AMERICA, coward!

Dariush said...

Quote SZ: "your sources are all from dissident sites with shoddy reputations for reporting"

SZ, your smack-talk is not only void of logic, but entirely incoherent. SZ obviously finds state-run and funded TV as a more objective and "immaculately reputable" source lol. Is this guy for real?

Rostam Farrokhzad said...

I just find it funny that the original bache Mollah - Karroubi jounior gets his head kicked in by the same thugs that his baba fronted for 20 years before he realised which way the wind was blowing and jumped ship like the rat he is. Karroubi and Mousavi should honestly distance themselves from the fascist Islamic Republic and Khomieni and recant their crimes. else they remain part of the crminal regime that they wish to recast in a less evil form.

Anonymous said...

The fact it's said that this thug got permission from his superior makes two guilty. I hope they both get punished and we get to hear about it.

Sohrab said...

"Defending his father in that instance was illegal because he nor his father had permits to protest."

SZ - let's play a simple logic game.

Under Apartheid, the South African state subjected black South Africans to numerous humiliations and discriminatory practices. When the blacks cried out in protest, the government responded with merciless brutality.

Now, here's the catch. That government justified everything it did in the name of the law and by pointing to relevant rules and statutes. The Apartheid regime was built on an elaborate legal edifice. Each act of discrimination and brutality was based on legal rule.

Now, just because this was the case, can you morally justify Apartheid? Go ahead and try!

"Apartheid was okay because it was legal." That is your argument in so many words. "Beating people for exercising their right to protest is okay as long as there is a rule or statute that justifies it."

Go ahead an try to untangle this mess you've created. You can't.

SZ said...

Arash,

you're an idiot dude.

Who are you calling a bache sefarati? you're a fucking british lackey you tool!

The last thing I care about is what a prick like you thinks about Iran. go protest outside the Iranian embassy in England, it may change the world! haha.

SZ said...

Dariush,

"your smack-talk is not only void of logic, but entirely incoherent."

its incoherent because you can't fucking comprehend anything. you're a tool.

I guess you don't like the BBC, a state funded news source, I guess you don't like any of the state funded news sources aroudn the world because they don't meet your level of objectivity. Instead, you believe what some blogger says about iran as fact! hahaha..get lost koskesh!

SZ said...

Anon,

Good one! you have any proof to back it up? or are you just going to post lies and think its cool cause you post under anonymous? You're an idiot!

Arash said...

SZ Bisharaf

"Defending his father in that instance was illegal".

How can you say such a thing? You're living on another planet.

خجالت بکش، بیغیرت

Arash

SZ said...

Arash,

you're the one living on another planet. hahaha..its funny how people like you think they are in the majority!

SZ said...

Sohrab,

This isn't apartheid. Each country has a legal framework. Each citizen must abide by that legal framework.

In South Africa, the blacks didn't have any participation rights in making those laws which were unjust and wrong. In Iran, people VOTE and elect their parliament members, they have a say over what laws are passed and not passed. It's like that in any country with elections and representation...you have to follow the laws of the land. if you come out without a permit, and protest against a government which you led for a number of years (Karroubi), then you shouldn't be surprised if you get arrested. Your son can protect your morally, but legally, he doesn't have a leg to stand on.

Anonymous said...

Potkin, please please publish this!


SZ,

'haa haa haa, hee hee haa'

(k*r e khar!!)

yeah man get your ticket, get on that plane and mozy down to London town blood. I have to meet with you - take me as your disciple oh my lord saviour for I am a blind one legged ladyboy and and... and learrrn me things some!!

You're a rudeboy aren't you? huhn rudie??! Seriously. You are a bloody pimp SZ. I F*@£ing LOVE YOOOOOO! xxxxxxx

Azarmehr said...

anon,

I published it, but what was the point in your comment???

Sohrab said...

See SZ for the first time you had to concede a basic point - that just because govt action is legal doesn't mean its moral. The very worst of the 20th century's atrocities were committed by govts claiming to be merely following the law. Sure every country has different laws but human beings share some God given moral intuitions that allow us to say "hey that's a bad law, what the govt is doing is wrong."

fanofgreen said...

as often on these subjects that are dire and nasty, there are so many that try to justify with insults. It's always the same.