Watch the footage below. It is the anniversary of Ayatollah Khomeini's return to Iran and the Iranian embassy in France is preparing for a party in Neauphle-le-Chateau, where Ayatollah Khomeini resided during his exile in France.
Supporters of the Green Movement in France are holding a peaceful picket. They even tell the embassy staff, 'You are our brothers'. All is under control until the ambassador arrives with the rest of the embassy entourage. The ambassador cannot even tolerate a peaceful picket by a few in France. One of Mr. Ambassador's lackeys starts shouting profanities at the protesters, calling their mothers whores! The protesters still show constraint and don't lower themselves to exchange insults. Mr. Ambassador can not take it any more however. How dare they protest against the regime in France? He lunges towards the protesters but is duly brought down by the French police and held down on the floor.
This is a great clip. This just shows the nature of the IRI. A diplomat is supposed to behave with dignity and practice "diplomacy" - instead what this shows is hot headed, violent irrational behaviour. Then we get assholes like SZ defending this regime accusing protestors of starting violence in the street. SZ also defends the right of this regime to have nuclear technology - is it any wonder why the rest of the world can't trust this regime with nuclear technology when their representatives behave like this?
Fuck the IRI and fuck SZ tokhme sag.
Can you promote this
(sorry for posting it here, but I do not have your email address!)
Who are those bunch of morons?
How can you shout "Khamenei ghateleh, velayatesh bateleh", then stand proudly in front of a picture of that scumbag Khomeini?! WTF, oxymoron much?!
You going to the CASMII event tonight?
completely brilliant......The Embassy staff showed themselves up for what they represent.....violence and violence and oppression.
I just heard that one of the defendents in the show trial today, was a 24 year old women with dual British/Iranian citizenship - is this right? Maybe by highlighting her as much as possible over here, it will serve to bring the atrocities of the regime and torture in Evin prison, to the attention of the British public......which might help others in her unbearable position.
Excellent video clip
Good, with that type of behavior the Ambassador deserve to be chained like an animal
First off, you're the tokhme sag, you're the koskesh. Fuck you.
Just because this one diplomat lost it and attacked another asshole who is cursing Iran doesn't mean that Iran doesn't have the right to nuclear technology. Its called a right for a reason you fuck face.
The rest of the world can go to hell if they don't "trust" Iran to have nuclear technology. It's become clear now, you want Iran to be a client state like Saudi Arabia or Kuwait. Well fuck you, that won't happen, Iran will have its nuclear power because its our RIGHT to have any new technologies we wish.
Fuck you. you're an idiot.
SZ, I want an independent Iran. The problem is having nuclear capabilities in the hands of this vilolent regime is dangerous for the world. You'd be fucking mental to allow a regime that sponsors terrorism throughout the middle east to have access to this technology. I actually wish there were no nuclear weapons in the world at all, but while they are here I'd rather they be in the hands of the rational than the irrational. It worries me that there are unstable countries like S Korea & Pakistan that have these weapons already. Adding a bunch mentally retarded akhoonds to the equation makes me shiver.
And for the record - fuck you, you're the idiot.
Fuck SZ tokhme sag too.... LOL
Yes SZ criminals deserve lethal technology. That, at least is the position you must take, if you are consistent in your support of the mullahs possessing nuclear technology. And you know, it's funny how you equate opposing the mad mullahs to opposing the nation of Iran! If the mullahs and the Iranian people are in opposition, then the mullahs have no right to represent those they oppress. But if the mullahs and the Iranian people are in agreement, then the Iranian people are supporters of terrorism! Either way the mullahs do not deserve nuclear technology no matter how much you use national sovereignty as a justification!
I am APPALLED by this story. I did a comedy video about Arash, Ahmadinejad and this whole awful situation...
POLLS SHOW IRANIAN PEOPLE BACK AHMADINEJAD AND THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC.
THE OFFICIAL VOTING FIGURES AND THE SURVEY RESULTS ARE THE SAME!
I think you just proved Amirs point.
LIVE STREAM: What Does the Iranian Public Really Think?
Posted on February 3rd
Dear Potkin: I thought you might want to know about this and take them to task.
Iran sponsors terrorists? According to who's definition of terrorism? You're a fucking lackey of the west. We protect our interests in the region which happen to be in direct opposition to the US's interests in the region, so what, sue us. Fuck off you lackey.
You don't ever talk about the issues, you just post bullshit and talk bullshit.
You are a typical western pundit with regards to Iran, let's dissect your argument.
"if you are consistent in your support of the mullahs possessing nuclear technology."
That's like me saying the President of the US has nuclear weapons, or the President of France has nuclear weapons...WRONG. Nuclear technology belongs to not one person, its a right of any NATION to pursue it. You can't deny the right just because you disagree with the positions of the IRI.
"If the mullahs and the Iranian people are in opposition, then the mullahs have no right to represent those they oppress."
Last I checked, the people of Iran brought in the change they wanted in 1979. People who didn't like that change, like the dissidents on this site and other various sites, left the country and started to spread lies about Iran and its policies. The fact is that Iranians by and large support their government and its right to nuclear energy.
"But if the mullahs and the Iranian people are in agreement, then the Iranian people are supporters of terrorism!"
Again, terrorism by who's definition? What the hell are you talking about? the MEK is a terrorist organization, Al Qeada is a terrorist organization...those I will agree with, but who is to say that Iran is a supporter of terrorist groups? Last I checked, Iran supports a legitimate party in Lebanon called Hezbollah, and it supports a resistance group and a political group called Hamas in Palestine. What is this BS about Iran supporting terrorists. Just because these people we support are killing your pussy marines, doesn't mean we are on the wrong side and you're on the right.
Shallow intellectuals like you are a dime a dozen, come back with something better next time.
Either way the mullahs do not deserve nuclear technology no matter how much you use national sovereignty as a justification!
"You'd be fucking mental to allow a regime that sponsors terrorism throughout the middle east to have access to this technology."
What about Pakistan and Israel? Both are state sponsors of terrorism and both have nuclear weapons.
Don't get me wrong, I agree with you that no nation should have nuclear weapons and for that very reason I wouldn't want Iran, whether democratic or theocratic, to have nukes.
But all this issue does is to serve the IRI - it's their fallback issue; their domestic cushion.
Just look at how Nazi SZ gets about it. And there are stooges like him all across Iran. And how do we treat stooges? We let them go upon their way and tap them on the back. Mashalah SZ jan.
This is one issue in which our opinions will not effect the outcome, so just agree with SZ that it's our "right" before he chokes on his own spit.
It's hilarious. These stooges want nuclear rights while the rest of us want human rights.
I did metion Pakistan and by mistake I said S korea when I meant N Korea.
I understand your point but I think you are going about it the wrong way. At every opportunity we have to let the regime & their stooges know their way of thinking is incorrect. To stay quiet will only make them think they are right. You have to confront the evil. The more they choke and spit with rage the more reason for them not to have access to the technology. These people are mentally unstable. Don't get me wrong, no one says that Iran shouldn't have the right to nuclear technology (although the less nuclear tech in the world the better), the problem lies with the regime. No one thinks 'this regime' has the right to nuclear technology simply based on its violent nature and its continual support of terrorism in much of the middle east and beyond.
I keep watching this video. It is such a resounding victory for the movement. Our people -- both back home and those in exile -- behave with so much dignity in the face of violence and insults and all the instruments of state powwer. The regime stooges, on the other hand, can't help but embarrass themselves. Beautiful!
Your points are so idiotic that it makes me cringe when I read them.
"At every opportunity we have to let the regime & their stooges know their way of thinking is incorrect."
You are the stooge. At every opportunity we have to let the idiotic dissidents know that they are incorrect.
I can play that game as well you fucking nutcase.
"The more they choke and spit with rage the more reason for them not to have access to the technology."
Explain that one to me? If people get upset and angry when they defend their right to anything, you think they don't deserve it. Having access to any technology is not for anyone to decide you fucking idiot, its for Iranians to decide, and we have overwhelmingly decided to pursue it.
"These people are mentally unstable."
On the contrary, people like you are mentally unstable. You foam at the mouth when you talk about Iran's government. Your hate has clouded your better judgment, and you can't even make a coherent argument as to why Iran doesn't have the right to nuclear technology. Fuck off.
"Don't get me wrong, no one says that Iran shouldn't have the right to nuclear technology (although the less nuclear tech in the world the better)"
Correction, YOU said Iran doesn't have the right to nuclear because of it's government. And also, you fucking idiot, the proven reserves of Oil and Gas of Iran have been projected to run out around 2050, you want us to forego nuclear so you can sleep easy at night you fucking scumbag. Then when our energy supplies run out, people like you will want the UK and US to sell us the same nuclear technology they have. Fuck you. We are developing nuclear power because we want to preserve our own fossil fuels, and because we want to export more in order to produce revenue. Go to hell if you don't like it.
"No one thinks 'this regime' has the right to nuclear technology simply based on its violent nature and its continual support of terrorism in much of the middle east and beyond."
You just said above that no one says iran doesn't have the right, now you are saying in the very next paragraph that Iran does not have the right? Make up your mind you fucking tool. Again you dodge the qustion that Barmakid posed.
Israel is a state supporter of terrorism, so is Pakistan, and yet they have nuclear weapons...why can they have it, but Iran cannot? Furthermore, Iran has NEVER stated it wants nuclear weapons, just nuclear energy. Also, as a sidebar, Israel and Pakistan countries like the US have a much more violent nature than Iran does. Last I checked Iran wasn't bulldozing people's houses and wasn't firing precision strike missiles into residential neighborhoods. Last I checked, Iran wasn't funding al qaeda and wasn't harboring them on its soil. Both of those things, Israel and Pakistan do respectively. Now an asshole like you wants to come and spit out your bullshit about iran being violent? Tell me, what country has Iran invaded the past 30 years? since the inception of the IRI? Please tell me?
SZye madar jendeh,
Israel is not a state sponsor of terrorism. It doesn't appear on the State Dept.'s list of state sponsors of terrorism or on the EU's. No legitimate international entity body has ever accused Israel of being a state sponsor. Unlike the IRI, Israel has no ties with non-state actors, like HAMAS and Hizbullah, widely condemned by the US, EU, and the rest of the international community for carrying out terrorist acts.
Did you just say that because Israel doesn't show up on the US and EU list for sponsors of terror it's not? Is that your reasoning? Has it ever occurred to you that maybe the EU and US are allies of Israel....hmmm...or maybe that Israel has such a strong lobby in the United States that it would never be on such a list. Or maybe that because of this lobby, the US has the most number of vetoes of resolutions against Israel in the UN than anyone else! Dude, fuck off! hahahah..what a fucking idiot!
"Unlike the IRI, Israel has no ties with non-state actors, like HAMAS and Hizbullah"
Last I checked, both of those were POLITICAL PARTIES running a country and/or territory. They are not NON-state actors you imbecile. Hezbollah has 11 cabinet members in Lebanon! Are you that big of an idiot where you can't even get your terms straight! Seriously, stop being such an ignorant prick.
I made a mistake, you're the stooge. Listen to yourself. I swear, this time when I read your comment I was smiling the whole way through. You're so brainwashed its funny.
OF COURSE Israel wouldn't be on the US State Department's list. And yes, neither is Pakistan. Why you ask?
Because that list has more to do with politics than actual terrorism. It's meant to fool people like you (mission accomplished).
Human Rights Watch recently published a report that was supported by the UN Secretary General that charged Israel with over 40 war crimes. The UN Secretary General called it terrorism!! So shove the nonsense about "no international entity has bla bla bla..."
You think its not terrorism what Israel does in the Gaza Strip?
Do me a favor, pick one of the 17 definitions the US State Department has for terrorism and then ask yourself if Israel is a state sponsor of terror.
Wait. You know what, they aren't state sponsors of terrorism - they do no such sponsoring; they ARE state terrorist.
There is some blame to be placed on Palestinians too, but people like you only choose to see what you want.
You must be Jewish, if you're not, then you are seriously a retard. You have no accurate knowledge of international relations.
You talk to me about the NIAC using their non-profit status for political advocacy.. HAHAHA
And how long have you been studying politics now?
Or should I say, how long have you been dreaming about gargling Leo Strauss's salty testicles?
Sohrab - You and SZ are different sides of the same coin. You support a warmongering, terrorist regime just like he does - and neither of you realize it.
SZ can you ever spell an Iranian word correctly? Its Koskesh not Koshkesh koskesh
HAMAS and Hizbullah have not always been in power. And many world governments still do not recognize HAMAS as a legitimate government.
Moreover, the IRI supported these entities long before they assumed the mantle of state and while they were illegal terrorist organizations.
"You talk to me about the NIAC using their non-profit status for political advocacy.. HAHAHA"
Barmakid, this is not some joke. You can't lobby members of congress if you don't have a license and operate solely as a non-profit. Like I said, I hope you are not too involved to be implicated. See, e.g., link below.
Also, you wrote, "you must be Jewish": it is one of the latest anti-semitic tropes to equate support for the only democracy in the Middle East with Jewishness, as though one can't reasonably and independently reach this conclusion. I'm an unbeliever but my family is Muslim through and through and I take exception to that comment.
Once again jack ass, there is NO correct way to spell farsi! Are you an idiot? Show me the farsi dictionary that states how you should spell a word. If you do that, I will spell it however you want! If you can't present that! shut up about it!
you're an idiot! are you sure you're a law student?? I think you must be a Wal-Mart clerk or worse, a greeter...hahaha..fucking idiot!
and these are supposed to be the "green" movement people....
The average greeter at Walmart has more humanity, conscience, and moral sense in her pinky than you and your entire regime combined. I would rather be a greeter at Walmart than a well compensated stooge for a rapist regime any day.
You are an idiot, seriously. Your telling me non-profit groups don't have the right to "lobby" congressmen? Seriously? Sooo... HRW or Amnesty International don't lobby our government? Your telling me that non-profits can't be involved in government advocacy? I'll give you a chance to reconstruct what the hell you are saying because it's incredibly off the mark.
If you're talking about some procedural registrations that have to do with tax-deductions than your an idiot.
Nothing is gonna happen to the NIAC. NOTHING. And the fact that you live in America and don't suport their efforts is pitiful to me.
You don't like Trita Parsi? Who cares!! This organization is giving Iranian-Americans some political influence. Do you get that? Do you get that this organization stopped a bill recently from being passed by a racist republican that would have deported ALL Iranians on ANY kind of visa back to Iran? That includes student visas.
"Also, you wrote, "you must be Jewish": it is one of the latest anti-semitic tropes to equate support for the only democracy in the Middle East with Jewishness, as though one can't reasonably and independently reach this conclusion."
Hahaha - just like a blind supporter of Israel you trump out the anti-Semite card. Haha
And yes, I don't believe one can "REASONABLY" come to the conclusion that Israel is a benign state that provides democratic avenues to ALL of its citizens. Sure, you can reach that conclusion independently (of any facts), but reasonably - no way.
I am not Jewish. I am not Muslim. I am not Arab. And I am not a Persian nationalist. I am a liberal.
Israel is an apartheid, oppressive, artificial state - and to support its leaders is a moral crime.
Just like it is to support Khamenei and co.
p.s. I couldn't bring myself to read a Washington Times article. Next time you want to cite a source, make sure it's not a reactionary/alarmist right-wing publication.
A Wal-Mart clerk? Really? Didn't you vote for Ahmadinejad? Magar yeki az hadafhaye enghelab komak kardane mostazefin nabood?
How can you claim to support the revolution if you are making fun of the very people that the revolution was supposed to be for?
Many good people make their living at Wal-Mart. But nonetheless, I agree with the fact that Sohrab hasn't learned anything from law school.
In fact Sohrab, I can't help but to identify you with Sara Palin supporters. Sorry buddy, but you need to open up your eyes.
You CANNOT be a supporter of the Straussian concoction of "natural rights" and support the Israeli state at the same time.
Your views are devoid of reason and logic.
Once again your idiotic comments are irrational.
You say many world governments don't recognize Hamas as a legitimate government....do you even know how many don't recognize Hamas as a legitimate government? Its literally less than 25 nations, and not surprisingly, all of them are in the west. The Non Aligned Movement, which consists of about 110 nations, recognizes Hamas as the legitimate government of Palestine
Not to mention, there was an ELECTION and Hamas won. Who are you to say they aren't legitimate. You are correct, the IRI supports Hamas, because it shares a common goal. What is so wrong about that? Just because you don't agree with the IRI policies, doesn't mean that they are wrong.
The same holds true for Hezbollah. They were elected, whether some western nation recognizes them or not, has no bearing on its legitimate right to rule based on the will of its people. Seriously, are you sure you're a law student?
Get lost kid.
whaaaat? Shit or get of the pot. Reminds me of fighting pussys in jr. high.
Post a Comment